Difference between revisions of "User Stories:BETA-BLIP"

From Phaserwiki
(edit, add script and reference)
Line 15: Line 15:
 
|}
 
|}
  
The case of β-lactamase (BETA)–β-lactamase inhibitor (BLIP) has been used repeatedly as a test case for Phaser because the original structure solution by MR using AMoRe (Navaza, 1994) was difficult even though good models were available (the structures of both components had already been solved in isolation; Strynadka et al., 1996). The difficult part of the MR solution was placing BLIP. The command script for the solution of BETA–BLIP using the ‘automated MR’ mode of Phaser is shown in Appendix A1. The search order is given as BETA and then BLIP. This is because BETA, with 62% of the molecular weight, would be expected to have the highest fraction scattering (and indeed it does, as the B factors for BETA and BLIP are comparable). Phaser rapidly produces a correct solution for the complex.  
+
The case of β-lactamase (BETA)–β-lactamase inhibitor (BLIP) has been used repeatedly as a test case for Phaser because the original structure solution by MR using AMoRe was difficult even though good models were available (the structures of both components had already been solved in isolation). The difficult part of the MR solution was placing BLIP. Phaser rapidly produces a correct solution for the complex.  
  
 
This previously difficult structure solution becomes trivial because of two algorithms implemented in Phaser.
 
This previously difficult structure solution becomes trivial because of two algorithms implemented in Phaser.
  
*The first is the anisotropy correction; there is significant anisotropy in the data (the maximum B-factor difference in different directions is 32 Ų).  
+
*The anisotropy correction; there is significant anisotropy in the data (the maximum B-factor difference in different directions is 32 Ų).  
*The second is the improved rotation-function target in MLRF, particularly in that the solution for BETA can be used to find the correct rotation-function solution for BLIP. Using the traditional Crowther (1972) fast rotation function, the Z score for the correct BLIP placement is 3.8 and the top Z score of 4.4 corresponds to an incorrect placement. Using MLRF and the prior knowledge about the placement of BETA, the correct placement of BLIP has a Z score of 6.5 and is the highest score in the search. (These results are for data that have had the anisotropy correction applied, to illustrate the improvement given by the MLRF alone.)
+
*The improved rotation-function target in MLRF, particularly in that the solution for BETA can be used to find the correct rotation-function solution for BLIP. Using the traditional Crowther (1972) fast rotation function, the Z score for the correct BLIP placement is 3.8 and the top Z score of 4.4 corresponds to an incorrect placement. Using MLRF and the prior knowledge about the placement of BETA, the correct placement of BLIP has a Z score of 6.5 and is the highest score in the search. (These results are for data that have had the anisotropy correction applied, to illustrate the improvement given by the MLRF alone.)
 +
 
 +
;Keyword script
 +
<pre>
 +
MODE MR_AUTO
 +
HKLIN beta_blip.mtz
 +
LABIN F=Fobs SIGF=Sigma
 +
ENSEMBLE BETA PDB beta.pdb ID 100
 +
ENSEMBLE BLIP PDB blip.pdb ID 100
 +
SEARCH ENSEMBLE BETA
 +
SEARCH ENSEMBLE BLIP
 +
</pre>
 +
 
 +
;References
 +
:[http://antarctic/phaserwiki/images/4/40/Ba5095.pdf Solving structures of protein complexes by molecular replacement with Phaser ]
 +
:McCoy AJ
 +
:Acta Cryst. (2007). D63, 32-41

Revision as of 20:31, 11 July 2009

Crystallographic details
Space Group P3221
Unit Cell
Contents of
asymmetric unit
BETA and BLIP
Models 100% identity

The case of β-lactamase (BETA)–β-lactamase inhibitor (BLIP) has been used repeatedly as a test case for Phaser because the original structure solution by MR using AMoRe was difficult even though good models were available (the structures of both components had already been solved in isolation). The difficult part of the MR solution was placing BLIP. Phaser rapidly produces a correct solution for the complex.

This previously difficult structure solution becomes trivial because of two algorithms implemented in Phaser.

  • The anisotropy correction; there is significant anisotropy in the data (the maximum B-factor difference in different directions is 32 Ų).
  • The improved rotation-function target in MLRF, particularly in that the solution for BETA can be used to find the correct rotation-function solution for BLIP. Using the traditional Crowther (1972) fast rotation function, the Z score for the correct BLIP placement is 3.8 and the top Z score of 4.4 corresponds to an incorrect placement. Using MLRF and the prior knowledge about the placement of BETA, the correct placement of BLIP has a Z score of 6.5 and is the highest score in the search. (These results are for data that have had the anisotropy correction applied, to illustrate the improvement given by the MLRF alone.)
Keyword script
MODE MR_AUTO
HKLIN beta_blip.mtz
LABIN F=Fobs SIGF=Sigma
ENSEMBLE BETA PDB beta.pdb ID 100
ENSEMBLE BLIP PDB blip.pdb ID 100
SEARCH ENSEMBLE BETA
SEARCH ENSEMBLE BLIP
References
Solving structures of protein complexes by molecular replacement with Phaser
McCoy AJ
Acta Cryst. (2007). D63, 32-41